From: RamKarthikeyan (rii@sify.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 05:00:26 GMT-3
Janto,
With lo in R* you are using discontigous subnet in RIP1. Try using RIP
version 2 in Rip domain.
Ram
----- Original Message -----
From: "Janto Cin" <jantocin@datacomm.co.id>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <dhoode@skylinecomputer.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:50 AM
Subject: Mutual Redistribution between RIP and OSPF Again
> Dear All,
>
> I've problem when doing mutual redistribution between RIP and OSPF.
>
> R5(e0)------(e0)R7(s0)-------(s0)R8(e0)
>
> R5 e0: 150.50.201.5/24
> R7 e0: 150.50.201.7/24
> R7 s0: 192.168.10.1/30
> R8 s0: 192.168.10.2/30
> R8 lo0: 150.50.8.8/32
> R8 e0: 10.1.1.1/8
>
> R5-R7 as OSPF area 0, R7-R8 as RIPv1 and mutual redistribution between
> both protocols at R7.
>
> I can see R8 lo0 in R5 routing table but why I can't see 150.50.201.0/24
> in R8 routing table?
> If I remove the lo0 at R8, I have route 150.50.0.0/16 in R8 routing
> table.
> How to achieve connectivity by not remove the lo0 at R8 and not use the
> static/default route?
> TIA.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Janto
> ..
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3