From: Joe Martin (jmartin@capitalpremium.net)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 15:50:19 GMT-3
RIP Auto-summaryOriginally, yes, I was using v1. I was just testing RIP =
behaviors. I have discontiguous subnets. I knew this would not work =
with RIP v1. I just wanted to see what the debugs looked like. Then I =
switched to v2 and the summary routes remained even after a reload.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geralt Omhof [mailto:geralt@OmnIT.nl]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Joe Martin
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
My guess is you're using version 1.....=20
Geralt
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Joe Martin [mailto:jmartin@capitalpremium.net]=20
Sent: Thu 12/5/2002 6:32 PM=20
To: CCIE GroupStudy=20
Cc:=20
Subject: RIP Auto-summary
Why, if I enter the "no auto-summary" command under the RIP process, =
do I
still have summary routes at the classful boundary in the RIP =
database?
Maybe just a total brain fart? What am I missing?
Thanks,
Joe Martin
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:39 GMT-3