From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Sat Nov 30 2002 - 15:48:04 GMT-3
I believe that the reason why is because a router will not redistribute
a route unless it is in it's own routing table. So in effect, when you
redistibute eigrp 2 into ospf 1, all is well, but the eigrp 2 routes are
still used in the routing table.
At this point, all eigrp 2 routes are in the ospf database, but are not
available for redistribution into eigrp 1 because they are not in the
routing table.
You will see the same behavior if you use a distribute list with OSPF,
and then try to redistribute OSPF into another routing protocol. Even
though the route is in the OSPF database, it has been filtered from the
routing table with the distribute-list, disqualifying it from
redistribution.
Now, this is what I have observed in a mini-lab on this matter, however
if someone could add to this, or provide supporting URLs, I would
appreciate it. I couldn't find anything on CCO.
Jay Greenberg
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 10:00, Tim Fletcher wrote:
> Chen,
>
> A router will not redistribute routes out of a routing process that are redistributed into that process on the same router. You will have to redistribute between the 2 eigrp processes.
>
> -tim
>
> At 10:09 PM 11/30/02 +0800, chen yi wrote:
> >one router runs ospf and two eigrp process
> >want to redistribute from eigrp 1 to ospf,and from ospf to eigrp 2
> >but the result is eigrp 2 can not see routes in eigrp 1
> >why?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >OmSCJ@=gIOWn4s5D5gWSSJ<~O5M3!* MSN Hotmail!# http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:13 GMT-3