RE: Clarification : Solie Pg 824

From: cebuano (cebu2ccie@cox.net)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 12:10:47 GMT-3


Ajit,
Recall that OSPF areas are INTERFACE-specific. Just a glance on this lab
indicates that Hin_hq does NOT have an interface in area 10 or 20.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ajit
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:29 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Clarification : Solie Pg 824

The Clarification :

The Area Border Router's reflected in the answer of lab 25 walkthrough
are
wrong ?????

2 areas of clarification :-

1> With respect to the figure 12-16 on Page 824 of Solie, would it be
fair to
state that the router hin_hq is actually the ABR for Area 10 and Area
20.
Solie seems to state that gecko is ABr for 10 and tree_frog is ABR for
20
????

2> The virtual link for Area 75 in my mind shld be betweeb Python and
hin_hq ?
Solie seems to state to set it up between python and tree frog. Shouldnt
the
virtual link be actually set up between the 2 ABR's of Python
--->Transit
area 20 --->hin_hq router

his soultion seems to reflect differently.

Could someone tell me if I am missing anything out ???

thanks



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:11 GMT-3