RE: VPN Between CVPN3005 and Checkpoint FW-1 ver Next

From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@nz.logical.com)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 02:36:09 GMT-3


There is no difference really between FP3 and FP2. There is however a big
difference between FP2 and FP1, where a new VPN manager is used. You can
turn this off (I recommend this, as the VPN manager is only useful for very
large VPN deployments), however you must create a new security policy and
then configure it to use traditional VPN rules.

Apart from the above, NG is actually easier, as it now allows you to
configure IKE and IPSec timeouts per VPN-gateway, as opposed to globally
previously.

Regards,
Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Brown [mailto:spderman_po@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:43 AM
To: Peter Wodle; security@groupstudy.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VPN Between CVPN3005 and Checkpoint FW-1 ver Next Generation

I don't have nor have I found any good docs regarding
NG, especially NG FP3. IF you find good
sample/documentation regarding NG/FP3 I would be very interested as well :)

Regards,

Jason

--- Peter Wodle <peter_wodle@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Need to build & test a VPN Between CVPN3005 and
> Checkpoint FW-1 ver Next
> Generation. I see from the link below step by step
> details how to do this
> between CVPN3005 and Checkpoint FW-1 ver 4.1.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration
_example09186a00800946a4.shtml
>
> Is there anywhere a similar doc for CVPN3005 to
> Checkpoint FW-1 ver Next
> Generation? Hopefully with the best
> authentiaction/encryption.
> Could someone please forward their doc for this.
> Thanks a lot
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:10 GMT-3