From: beda jain (bpjain@cisco.com)
Date: Fri Nov 22 2002 - 12:46:12 GMT-3
Hi,
what is the difference if i put passive in local peer in place of remote peer.
I think when we apply in local peer it is applicable to all remote peer.
when we put in remote peer
it is applicable to that remote peer only. Am i correct ????
Thanks,
Beda
At 09:24 PM 11/21/2002 -0600, Robert Rech wrote:
>This local peer will not initiate a connection to 10.1.4.1, the other side
>will have to start the TCP connection.
>You may want to use this if the other end is using this connection as a
>backup and you do not want this side to be promiscuous.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "csc david" <davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:28 PM
>Subject: dlsw passive
>
>
> > Hi, what is the meaning of "passive" ?
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.5.3
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.4.1 passive
> >
> > when does this remote-peer become active?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > "JGIT>+S"Bp#?P!JTE#56;qJ1IP4s=1#!"
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 230 - Release Date: 10/24/2002
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 230 - Release Date: 10/24/2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:09 GMT-3