From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 22 2002 - 06:35:56 GMT-3
Joe,
"ip default-network" is classful, so you would probably rather use "ip route
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X" with eigrp, as you do with OSPF.
Kym
>From: Joe A <groupstudy@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: Joe A <groupstudy@comcast.net>
>To: "'MADMAN'" <dave@interprise.com>, "'Peter Wodle'"
><peter_wodle@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: IP default-netwrok command
>Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:00:53 -0500
>
>Dave,
>
>It states right in this link you forwarded to use it with both IGRP and
>EIGRP.
>
>Joe
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>MADMAN
>Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:51 PM
>To: Peter Wodle
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: IP default-netwrok command
>
>
>Peter Wodle wrote:
> >
> > Can someone please set me straight on "IP default-netwrok".
> >
> > Is this command only useable in IGRP & EIGRP or can you deploy it in
> > other routing protocols (e.g. OSPF & RIP)?
>
> I have only used it with IGRP, EIGRP understands 0.0.0.0,
>
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_n
>ote09186a0080094374.shtml
> Dave
>
>--
>David Madland
>CCIE# 2016
>Sr. Network Engineer
>Qwest Communications
>612-664-3367
>
>"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
>Churchill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:08 GMT-3