From: Scott Livingston (scottl@sprinthosting.net)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 19:31:30 GMT-3
OOOO very nice! Thank you sir!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Lileikis [mailto:glileikis@rogers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:11 PM
To: 'Scott Livingston'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
TCP connections can be configured to terminate after a specific period
of idle time (inactivity option) or after a specific period of no active
llc sessions (no-llc option). These options are mutually exclusive of
each other. Using the inactivity option could bring down a quiet SNA
session that is still active.
Cheers...Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Livingston [mailto:scottl@sprinthosting.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: scottl@unix.sprint.net
Subject: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
HMMMMMM?
So I am working the FatKid.com lab '441 Advanced DLSw' and I am looking
at #6. The solution used was 'inactivity' and I used 'no-llc' for the
dynamic option. So the question I have is; when do I use no-llc vs
inactivity?
Thank You!
Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:07 GMT-3