From: Robert Massiache (robert2140@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 18:51:39 GMT-3
Yes it is very much a valid solution...refer "OSPF Design Guide" by Sam
Halabi. He detailed this problem.
thanks
>From: "Persio Pucci" <persiopucci@uol.com.br>
>Reply-To: "Persio Pucci" <persiopucci@uol.com.br>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: Discontiguous OSPF area 0 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:25:32
>-0200
>
>Andy,
>
>that's acceptable, but shall not be considered as a permanent solution. You
>can use a virtual link to connect a discontiguous area 0 to make it show
>like it is one continuous area. This is mostly used as a backup to prevent
>an area 0 to be splitted during a failure...
>
>Persio
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <ANDF@nnpi.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:43 PM
>Subject: Discontiguous OSPF area 0
>
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The chapter 32 lab in IP Expert version 3.0, has two area 0s that are
> > separated by another area. The solution connects the area 0s through a
> > virtual link. Is this a valid configuration? I was under the impression
>that
> > the OSPF area 0 cannot be discontiguous. Any comments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy Fernandes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:07 GMT-3