From: Robert Massiache (robert2140@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 17 2002 - 23:28:47 GMT-3
Tim,
The reason was that I used to have the 'neighbor' command on all my lab
practices and never depend on the dynamic adjacecny. This way I lost touch
somewhat...not an excuse I make here...however as a CCIE I know I should be
known everlasting.
thanks
>From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
>To: "'Robert Massiache'" <robert2140@hotmail.com>
>CC: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
>Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:09:34 -0500
>
>Whew! The instant set in of fear after I noticied the ccie tag under your
>name and the discrepancy between my initial thought of what the timers
>were.
>Glad that was resolved.
>
>I can now resume life now that we've agreed.
>
>*grin*
>
>Tim
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Massiache [mailto:robert2140@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:56 PM
>To: tim.ouellette@eds.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
>
>
>thanks for the link. I am sorry I found my mistake.
>
>We need to adjust the timers. I agree.
>
>thanks
>Robert M
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
> >To: "'Robert Massiache'" <robert2140@hotmail.com>
> >CC: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
> >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:48:53 -0500
> >
> >Sure thought PTP and broadcast was 10/40, PTM and non_broadcast is
> >30/120.
> >Hello/Dead times respectively.
> >
> >Check out out the following page. There is a chart of the default timers
> >in
> >it.
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/22.html
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Robert Massiache [mailto:robert2140@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:06 PM
> >To: cciemail@intellinet.ws; Kevin.Tang@telecom.co.nz;
> >Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com; namaste@pacbell.net;
> >CCIElab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >No you are not.
> >
> >You are allowed to create a subinterface on R3. So create a
>point-to-point
> >sub interface. This command would change the hello interval to match the
> >one
> >
> >on the multipoint interface on the other end.
> >
> >In essence, you are not to change the timers manually.
> >
> >The theory is, the default hello timer values of the point-to-point and
> >point-to-multipoint are the same, ie.,30 Sec.
> >
> >thanks
> >Robert M
> >CCIE #
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Nate Kleven <cciemail@intellinet.ws>
> > >To: 'Robert Massiache' <robert2140@hotmail.com>,
> >Kevin.Tang@telecom.co.nz,
> > >Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com, namaste@pacbell.net, Nate Kleven
> > ><cciemail@intellinet.ws>, CCIElab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
> > >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:51:32 -0800
> > >
> > >You also need to change the "IP OSPF HELLO-INTERVAL" on r3 to 30
>seconds
> >to
> > >match multipoint networks.
> > >
> > >__________
> > >
> > >Nate Kleven
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Robert Massiache [mailto:robert2140@hotmail.com]
> > >Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 4:48 PM
> > >To: Kevin.Tang@telecom.co.nz; Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com;
> > >namaste@pacbell.net; cciemail@intellinet.ws; CCIElab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist - A Correction
> > >
> > >
> > >I am sorry I wish a small correction has to be made to my previous
> >posting.
> > >I give the corected one here.
> > >
> > >On R2 create a point-to-multipoint subinterface.
> > >On R3 create a point-to-point subinterface.
> > >On R4 being a physical interface use the command 'ip ospf network
> > >point-to-point' on the interface.
> > >
> > >Make the R2 as DR by using the command "ip ospf pri 0" on R3 and R4
> > >
> > >
> > >thanks
> > >Robert M
> > >CCIE #10583
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Kevin Tang" <Kevin.Tang@telecom.co.nz>
> > > >Reply-To: "Kevin Tang" <Kevin.Tang@telecom.co.nz>
> > > >To: "Jennifer Bellucci" <Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com>, eric
> > > ><namaste@pacbell.net>, "Nate Kleven" <cciemail@intellinet.ws>,
> > > >CCIElab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist
> > > >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:09:44 +1300
> > > >
> > > >Also you need add local policy routing in R3 and R4. Because you are
> > > >using
> > > >OSPF multi-access network, (not point-to-point or point-to-multipoint
> > > >network) and the frame-switch network is not full-mesh network. R3
>and
> >R4
> > > >talk to each other have to via R2.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Jennifer Bellucci [mailto:Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com]
> > > >Sent: Sun 17/11/2002 11:22 a.m.
> > > >To: eric; Nate Kleven; CCIElab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Cc:
> > > >Subject: Re: OSPF On NBMA with a twist
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > insert neighbour command under ospf and don't forget to turn of ip
> > >split
> > > > where needed
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "eric" <namaste@pacbell.net>
> > > > To: "Nate Kleven" <cciemail@intellinet.ws>; <CCIElab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:31 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: OSPF On NBMA with a twist
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > You have 2 issues to address here take a look at the timers on the
> > >diff.
> > > > > interfaces and then address any DR issues that might come up.
> > > > >
> > > > > ~e
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> > >Behalf Of
> > > > > Nate Kleven
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:33 PM
> > > > > To: 'CCIElab@groupstudy.com'
> > > > > Subject: OSPF On NBMA with a twist
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R2
> > > > > / \
> > > > > / \
> > > > > / \
> > > > > R4 R3
> > > > >
> > > > > Hub and Spoke Topology
> > > > > R2 Has a PVC to R4 and R3
> > > > >
> > > > > - R2/R3/R4 Share the 10.10.10.0/27 Network
> > > > > - R4 Must be configured using a Physical Interface
> > > > > - R3 & R2 Must be configured using Sub-interfaces
> > > > > - R2's Serial Subinterface must be configured as a multipoint
> > >interface,
> > > > not
> > > > > a Non-broadcast.
> > > > > - You may not use the "IP OSPF NETWORK" command on R3
> > > > >
> > > > > I have not been able to get this working and meet all th
> > >requirements.
> > > > > Anyone out there seen this before?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nate
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >-------
> > > >"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential.
> > > >If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read
> > > >it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not
> > > >copy or use any part of this communication or disclose
> > > >anything about it. Thank you."
> > > >
> > >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >-------
> > >
> > >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:03 GMT-3