RE: 2610 2fxs

From: Nathan Kleven (nkleven@intellinet.ws)
Date: Fri Nov 15 2002 - 21:27:56 GMT-3


That's a good question. I would assume that the answer is yes. It is my
impression that ANY information about the lab that is not present on the
Official Cisco CCIE website is considered NDA material. Anyone else know
otherwise?

__________

Nate Kleven

Senior Network Engineer, CCNP Voice Access, MCSE

Expanets

6020 So 190th ST

Kent, WA 98032

(206)219.6135

"Experienced at Networked Solutions"

-----Original Message-----
From: Leo Seto [mailto:lseto@us.cnlink.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Nathan Kleven; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: 2610 2fxs

Is it an NDA violation if I say I saw an IOS other than 12.1 on one of the
lab routers?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Nathan Kleven
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:20 PM
To: 'Joe Cordoba'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: 2610 2fxs

All we know is that it is 12.1. No additional details have been published.

__________

Nate Kleven

Senior Network Engineer, CCNP Voice Access, MCSE

Expanets

6020 So 190th ST

Kent, WA 98032

(206)219.6135

"Experienced at Networked Solutions"

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Cordoba [mailto:cordoba@cistron.nl]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:19 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 2610 2fxs

Hello

Can somebody tell wich IOS version is the one they are using in the lab to
flash the 2610 with voice routers.

Best regards,
Joe Cordoba



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:01 GMT-3