Re: QOS again

From: Vijay S Jayaraman (vjayaram@in.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Nov 15 2002 - 07:16:45 GMT-3

Next message: frank.yu@japan.bnpparibas.com: "Re: QOS again"
Previous message: barroyo@sztele.com: "Re: PROBLEM WITH MAC-ADDRESS MAPPING IN CATALYST 3548 XL"
Maybe in reply to: Angelo De Guzman: "QOS again"
Next in thread: frank.yu@japan.bnpparibas.com: "Re: QOS again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Angelo,
You are right...you would need to use WRED......
random-detect precedence 6 40 1500 100.....

Regards,
Vijay.

                      Angelo De Guzman
                      <ghie_pogi@yahoo. To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                      com> cc:
                      Sent by: Subject: QOS again
                      nobody@groupstudy
                      .com


                      11/15/2002 03:20
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      Angelo De Guzman

hi,
Anyone knows how to solve this.

For packet w/ ip precedence 6, drop 1 packet every 100
packet. Maximum queue 1500, minimum queue is 40.
I'm thinking of using WRED.
Thanks,
Angelo

Next message: frank.yu@japan.bnpparibas.com: "Re: QOS again"
Previous message: barroyo@sztele.com: "Re: PROBLEM WITH MAC-ADDRESS MAPPING IN CATALYST 3548 XL"
Maybe in reply to: Angelo De Guzman: "QOS again"
Next in thread: frank.yu@japan.bnpparibas.com: "Re: QOS again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:01 GMT-3