From: inaki.blanco-acosta@bt.com
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 12:32:01 GMT-3
you can also configure a pq for RSVP flows in order to ensure that voip
traffic complies with service guarantees
ip rsvp pq-profile
rgds,
I.
-----Original Message-----
From: liuyi [mailto:a_netbug4@sina.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 15:00
To: Larson, Chris
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht for
voi ce s essions!!
I still wonder whether the bandwidth will be reserved for voip or not.How to
test it?
>Oh right. Sorry I was thinking of rsvp.
>
>RSVP 20 40
>
>my bad. Would that work? Or why not?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: liuyi [SMTP:a_netbug4@sina.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:00 PM
>> To: Larson, Chris
>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht
>> for voice s essions!!
>>
>> I do not think so.Ip rtp priority command used for only one flow
>> bandwidth.In
>>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_re
>> ference_chapter09186a008008078c.html#xtocid1495214
>> the example is for VoIP:
>> ip rtp priority 16384 16383 40
>>
>> correct me if i am wrong
>>
>>
>> >Why would you not use IP RTP priority 20 40 ? Wouldn't that allocate
>> 20k
>> >per sessions with a 40k max for all sessions?
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: A.Gesse [SMTP:A.Gesse@race.ru]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:53 AM
>> >> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>> >> Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht for
>> >> voice sessions!!
>> >>
>> >> RSVP may be a choice
>> >>
>> >> Alex
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
>> >> > Behalf Of Angelo De Guzman
>> >> > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:32 AM
>> >> > To: Ayman Hamza; deepesh@cisco.com
>> >> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve
>> >> > bandwidht for voice sessions!!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Ayman and all,
>> >> > Do we have a consensus on how are we going to solve
>> >> > this?
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Angelo
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --- Ayman Hamza <ayhamza@cisco.com> wrote:
>> >> > > Deepesh;
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks for your reply. To end this discussion , I
>> >> > > believe that the correct
>> >> > > answer is :
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Use ip rtp priority queueing to allocate the 40kb/s
>> >> > > pipe. Then use
>> >> > > LLQ to allocate the 20kb/s sessions.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > And ofcourse this solution should be configured on
>> >> > > all the possible
>> >> > > outbound interfaces that leads to alternative
>> >> > > destination voice dialer-peer.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > PLS concure this if it's possible !
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards;
>> >> > > Ayman
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 19:48:05 2002
>> >> > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> >> > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
>> >> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >> > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> >> > > reserve bandwidht for voice sessions!!
>> >> > > > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:45:57 -0800
>> >> > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >> > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >> > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>> >> > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> >> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
>> >> > > (9.0.2910.0)
>> >> > > > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>> >> > > V6.00.2600.0000
>> >> > > > Importance: Normal
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > The ""exact"" wording of the question is:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > All the voice traffic through frame
>> >> > > relay interface of R6 - R6 is
>> >> > > > > > > > > the hub router - should guarantee a
>> >> > > bandwidth of 40kb/s . Each
>> >> > > > > > > > > voice session
>> >> > > > > > > > > should have 20kb/s .
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > This means :
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > When there is any voice traffic, 40kb/s must be
>> >> > > allocated immediately
>> >> > > > > to the voice traffic on the DLCI it carries the
>> >> > > voice, and each
>> >> > > > > voice session
>> >> > > > > should be allocated 20kb/s once a voice traffic
>> >> > > is there . (Which
>> >> > > > > measn clearly
>> >> > > > > even if there is no congestion on the outbount
>> >> > > frame relay interface .
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I hope I have clarified the whole question
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks for the clarification. I don't know the
>> >> > > answer for this. We are
>> >> > > > talking about creating a 40 K pipe and then
>> >> > > allocating a chunk (20 K) within
>> >> > > > it.
>> >> > > > So some sort of FQ inside a PQ :)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > As Aansar suggested, on each router we can put
>> >> > > LLQ, and then use RSVP to
>> >> > > > create 20 K per session. But rsvp is not allowed.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > thanks
>> >> > > > deepesh
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Regards;
>> >> > > > > Ayman
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 00:39:52
>> >> > > 2002
>> >> > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> >> > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>
>> >> > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> >> > > reserve bandwidht
>> >> > > > > for voice sessions!!
>> >> > > > > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:38:14 -0800
>> >> > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >> > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >> > > > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>> >> > > > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> >> > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
>> >> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>> >> > > > > > Importance: Normal
>> >> > > > > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>> >> > > V6.00.2600.0000
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Hi
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Sorry, I didn't get the question earlier
>> >> > > > > > What the question says is to have
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > 1.
>> >> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
>> >> > > > > > AND
>> >> > > > > > Each voice session = 20 K
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > OR it means
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > 2.
>> >> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
>> >> > > > > > AND
>> >> > > > > > Each voice session <= 20 K
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Can you verify that ?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Your solution won't work here
>> >> > > > > > Reason is that bandwidth specified in ip rtp
>> >> > > priority cmd is
>> >> > > > > meant for all
>> >> > > > > > calls.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12
>> >> > > > > 0newft/120
>> >> > > > > > t/120t7/friprtp.htm
>> >> > > > > > (look for maximum total bandwidth string)
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Also frame-relay voice bandwidth command is
>> >> > > useless, when used
>> >> > > > > with ip rtp
>> >> > > > > > priority as ip rtp command, takes precedence
>> >> > > over any other
>> >> > > > > configuration
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Let me know the specifics of questions ...
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On a side note, if this is in exam, can we ask
>> >> > > proctor to
>> >> > > > > clarify this ? Are
>> >> > > > > > they aware of all questions ?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > thanks
>> >> > > > > > Deepesh
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
>> >> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>> >> > > > > > > Ayman Hamza
>> >> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:01 PM
>> >> > > > > > > To: deepesh@cisco.com
>> >> > > > > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> >> > > reserve
>> >> > > > > bandwidht for voice
>> >> > > > > > > sessions!!
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Hi Deepesh;
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. But I don't see how
>> >> > > you are allocating
>> >> > > > > (reserve)
>> >> > > > > > > 20kb/s for each session!! CBWFQ/LLQ won't
>> >> > > help in this,
>> >> > > > > right? PLS advise!
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Ayman
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > From nobody@groupstudy.com Tue Oct 29
>> >> > > 03:14:10 2002
>> >> > > > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan"
>> >> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> >> > > > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
>> >> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > > <ayman_hamza@hotmail.com>
>> >> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How
>> >> > > to reserve
>> >> > > > > bandwidht for voice
>> >> > > > > > > > sessions!!
>> >> > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:49:05 -0800
>> >> > > > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >> > > > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >> > > > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
>> >> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>> >> > > > > > > > X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by user
>> >> > > > > > > > Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
>> >> > > > > > > > Reply-To: "Deepesh Chouhan"
>> >> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Hi
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Cisco has fixed the problem. You should be
>> >> > > getting emails
>> >> > > > > on your cisco
>> >> > > > > > > > account now.
>> >> > >
>> >> > === message truncated ===
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > __________________________________________________
>> >> > Do you Yahoo!?
>> >> > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
>> >> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>>
>> ?
>> ?!
>>
>> liuyi
>> a_netbug4@sina.com
>>
VB
@q#!
liuyi
a_netbug4@sina.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:00 GMT-3