From: Deepesh Chouhan (deepesh@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 16:34:20 GMT-3
Yes
Reason being there is no other reference to tie l3 port channel i/f to l2
intf
1.
Entirely opposite e.g. is Dialer profiles
inter b0
dialer pool 23
inter d0
dialer pool 23
Here 'pool' keyword ties them together
2.
Same e.g. will be BVI
inter e0
bridge-group 34
inter bvi 34
Here besides intf number there is no command like,
inter bvi 34
bridge-group 34
thanks
deepesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:37 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: EtherChannel
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> In configuring the EtherChannel for layer 3 interfaces, does the
> port-channel number have to be the same as the channel-group number? Easy
> one but there is no definite answer in the doc.
>
> Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:56 GMT-3