From: Niall El-Assaad (nelassaa) (nelassaa@cisco.com)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 18:44:23 GMT-3
In the case of the second option you could use 2611XM, for the adsl
option you could use 2610XM. 10/100 are now standard on
XM series routers.
=======================================================
Niall El-Assaad, Systems Engineer, CCIE #7493
EMEA-UK Retail Finance North
C i s c o S y s t e m s
| |
| |
||| ||| E-mail: nialle@cisco.com
.:|||||:..:|||||:. SMS: nelassaa@epage.cisco.com
------------------ Web: http://www.cisco.com
Crescent House, Towers Business Park, Wilmslow Road,
Didsbury, Manchester M20 2JE, United Kingdom
========================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Ng [mailto:jhconsulting2001@yahoo.com]
Sent: 07 November 2002 22:07
To: Peter Wodle; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: security@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL
What will the bandwidth requirement be for each company? What's up/down
speed the ADSL ISP offering? Also, how many public addresses is this
ISP
giving you? Are there any services from these companies that need to be
access from the internet?
You may also put a ADSL card on the 2621 router.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Wodle" <peter_wodle@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <security@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL
> Hi All
>
> Can you please help on this. What is a cheap way of serving around 5
> (or may
> be 6) compnaies in the same building with say 20 PCs so that they can
> connect to Internet with one ADSL line? They must not see each other
as
> they
> are seperate companies.
>
> What I'm thinking:
> 1) 2621 with 4E NM card. One interafce to ADSL router with legal
> address
> (i.e. External LAN). Others interafces to each compnay hub with
Private
> IP
> addressess (i.e. internal LANs). Most private IPs to be NATed with
> overload
> on the exteranl router IP address. Some server IPs to be NATed usind
> one to
> one NAT.
> 2) Using may 2621. One interafce to ADSL router with legal address
> (i.e.
> External LAN). Other internal interafce to be trunked to a Catalyst.
> Internal FE to be sliced so that there are as many subinterfaces as
the
> companies. Cat to have as many VLANs as companies.
>
> Does this sound ok? Aany better/cheaper way?
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:56 GMT-3