RE: 2 FRTS map-class

From: Deepesh Chouhan (deepesh@cisco.com)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 07:31:13 GMT-3

• Next message: Deepesh Chouhan: "RE: ATM Classical IP vs. PVC question"
• Previous message: mize: "2 FRTS map-class"
• Maybe in reply to: mize: "2 FRTS map-class"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi

Almost similar question was asked about a week back. I don't have that
repply with me

I guess you can search it in archive

thanks
Deepesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> Behalf Of mize
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 12:29 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: 2 FRTS map-class
>
>
> Hi,Group:
> What's the difference between these two map-classes?
>
> map-class frame-relay frts1
> frame-relay cir 9600
> frame-relay bc 1200
> frame-relay be 1200
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> !
> map-class frame-relay frts2
> frame-relay traffic-rate 9600 19200
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
>
>
> Mize

• Next message: Deepesh Chouhan: "RE: ATM Classical IP vs. PVC question"
• Previous message: mize: "2 FRTS map-class"
• Maybe in reply to: mize: "2 FRTS map-class"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:56 GMT-3