From: Conrad Bullock (cjbullock@xtra.co.nz)
Date: Fri Nov 08 2002 - 08:14:58 GMT-3
Unless I'm missing the point, this looks like normal behaviour.
iBGP has an administrative distance of 200.
As the iBGP routes that you're talking about from iBGP are already in
the routing table with an AD of less than 200, the iBGP routes are not
installed.
Conrad
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nathan Chessin
Sent: Friday, 8 November 2002 9:10 p.m.
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF and BGP
Hi All,
My routing and BGP tables look like the below. Question is, why isn't
the
BGP route being installed as valid. I have routes to next-hop and also
the
networks in the bgp table.
I read that If the matching route is learned from an OSPF neighbor, its
OSPF
router ID must match the BGP router ID of the iBGP neighbor.
I tried changing those and still no luck.
Any ideas
(AS 2) (AS 2)
R3 ----iBGP---- R5
R5 output below...
Gateway of last resort is not set
34.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 34.1.1.0 [110/112] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:22, Serial2/0
1.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 1.1.0.0 [110/50] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:22, Serial2/0
35.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 35.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial2/0
O IA 2.0.0.0/8 [110/113] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:22, Serial2/0
100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E1 100.100.100.0 [110/132] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:22, Serial2/0
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 3.3.3.3 [110/49] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:23, Serial2/0
12.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 12.1.1.0 [110/112] via 35.1.1.3, 00:00:23, Serial2/0
R5#sib
BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 33.33.33.33
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i1.1.0.0/16 12.1.1.1 23 100 0 1 ?
* i100.100.100.0/24 12.1.1.1 23 100 0 1 ?
Nate
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:55 GMT-3