From: Nathan Chessin (nchessin@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 01:06:30 GMT-3
Andy,
The filter lists don't really advertise the MAC addresses in the way a "dlsw
icanreach mac-address aaaa.bbbb.cccc mask ffff.ffff.ffff" would advertise to
a remote peer. These filter lists specify what explorers can make a
connection to the remote peer. It's a way of filtering the MACs locally.
Nate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Diment, Andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:07 PM
> To: 'Charles T. Alexander'; GroupStudy
> Subject: RE: Solie Enchilada DLSW filter
>
>
> There is no difference. The second one would use if you had
> more than 1
> destination mac you wanted to advertise.
>
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles T. Alexander [mailto:ctalex405@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:11 AM
> To: GroupStudy
> Subject: Solie Enchilada DLSW filter
>
>
> I used the first:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 155.100.101.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 155.100.102.1 dest-mac
> 2200.900e.0001
>
> Solution states:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 155.100.101.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 155.100.102.1 dmac-output-list
> 701
> access-list 701 permit 2200.900e.0001 0000.0000.0000
>
> What is the difference.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:54 GMT-3