RE: GTS and FRTS

From: Shailen Amichand (shailen.amichand@xtra.co.nz)
Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 05:49:47 GMT-3

Next message: Tasuka Amano Hsu: "Compress IOS image"
Previous message: Szeto Jeff: "3550 root guard and loop guard"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "GTS and FRTS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

You will also need to consider what other QoS features you may want to
use in conjunction with Traffic Shaping. You can only use WFQ & CBWFQ on
GTS but you can use WFQ, CBWFQ, PQ & CQ with FRTS. Frequently you will
implement some form of queuing/prioritisation along with traffic
shaping.

Hope this helps
Shailen

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
aansar@sscomp.com.sg
Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 20:29
To: chenyan
Cc: ccielab; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: GTS and FRTS

you want to control the QOS per interface OR per PVC is the major
question?
most of the time interface is not the problem . PVC is the problem, so
you should look in to PVC (FRTS) rather than GTS.

"chenyan" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
06-11-02 12:23 PM
Please respond to "chenyan"

        To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
        cc:
        Subject: GTS and FRTS

hi,guys

I found that the GTS in the FR interface and the FRTS can play the same
role, can anybody tell me their differences?

Thanks

Next message: Tasuka Amano Hsu: "Compress IOS image"
Previous message: Szeto Jeff: "3550 root guard and loop guard"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "GTS and FRTS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3