From: Jaroslaw Zak (jaroslawz@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:31:14 GMT-3
But to answer the question, I would have thought if it's not necessary,
don't put it in, otherwise proctor might think you don't understand the
topic and put whatever line comes into your mind just in case.
Any other opinions?
Jarek
>From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
>Reply-To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
>To: enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: redistribution question again.
>Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:38:50 -0500
>
>I believe that the proctor is not going to think about what is in your
>mind.
>He will think about your config and if it is going to meet the
>requirements. Very simple words "MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS"
>
>Sam
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: enginedrive2002 [mailto:enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca]
>Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:17 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: redistribution question again.
>
>
>Most of the time, with single point mutual redistribution between two
>routing processes, we are safe with routing loop, sub-optimal route. In the
>lab exam, will it hurt to add the route-map or distribute-list in this
>situation? Will the proctor think you don't have a good understanding of
>route-map, distribute-list, and then you won't get the points supposed to
>have?
>
>What's your suggestion?
>
>
>E.D.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3