From: Chuck Church (cchurch@MAGNACOM.com)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 19:35:54 GMT-3
Even that might not be enough. It might meet the requirements, but if it's
not what the proctor had in mind, you might not get the points. It's not
fair, but that's life in the lab. If there are two ways you're thinking of
solving an issue in the lab, run them by the proctor. He/She might tell you
they were looking for solution 'B', not 'A'. Happened to me in the lab. He
didn't like the way I handled a certain issue. My way worked, but I didn't
push the issue. I changed to the solution he was looking for and passed.
Had I not changed it, might not have passed.
P.S. In the lab, you're not going to see any simple redistribution
scenarios. To be safe, I'd start out with the distribute lists. Much
easier to add them at the beginning, than waiting until the loops have
formed, you're running out of time, and becoming more frustrated. Speaking
from experience there :)
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Sr. Network Engineer
Magnacom Technologies
140 N. Rt. 303
Valley Cottage, NY 10989
845-267-4000
>I believe that the proctor is not going to think about what is in your
mind.
>He will think about your config and if it is going to meet the
>requirements. Very simple words "MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS"
>Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: enginedrive2002 [mailto:enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: redistribution question again.
Most of the time, with single point mutual redistribution between two
routing processes, we are safe with routing loop, sub-optimal route. In the
lab exam, will it hurt to add the route-map or distribute-list in this
situation? Will the proctor think you don't have a good understanding of
route-map, distribute-list, and then you won't get the points supposed to
have?
What's your suggestion?
E.D.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3