From: McClure, Allen (Allen.McClure@Tricon-Yum.Com)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 18:41:07 GMT-3
I looked at the lab and it looks like your standard NBMA network. Use
one subnet for the entire frame network. They don't want you to
separate it out into subintf's with different networks. Even if you
don't have a full mesh, it can be configured this way. You'll just have
a little bit of fun dealing with the nifty problems associated with such
a configuration.
Let me know if I'm missing something.
Allen McClure
MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
YUM! Brands, Inc.
Sr. Network Analyst
NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
972-338-7494
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de [mailto:Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:11 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Ipexpert solution is driving me nuts
Hello group,
I do not usually try to blame the scenario of the solution for my short
comings. However, the Ipexpert solutions provided in their web site is
full of mistakes (I think) Is any person out there experiencing this
problem or I should look harder in the wording and the solutions? For
example, lab 25 says the frame relay subnet of 170.1.100.0/24 should not
be further subnetted. However, the solution creates two subnets one
between R2 and R4 and the second between R2, R5 and R6. Thanks for your
help.
Sam
This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3