From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) (mm1343@sbc.com)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 15:25:04 GMT-3
As far as item 1 goes, I usually use the all zero's inverse mask because it
is less typing. In this scenario, both inverse mask styles will accomplish
the same thing. Obviously the all zero's inverse mask is more specific and
the 0.0.255.255 would catch any interfaces in the 10.1.X.X and 10.10.X.X
range. Regarding item # 2, I believe it is necessary to policy route on the
Frame Relay spokes due to the requirement. It has been awhile but I believe
they don't allow you to use spoke to spoke Frame maps. If you attempt to
ping from one spoke to another, your local policy routing will get your
packet to the other spoke but the other spoke still doesn't have a map to
you. Therefore, you have to policy route on all spokes to have true spoke to
spoke connectivity. Hopefully that helps. Good luck
-----Original Message-----
From: sandaga diop [mailto:sandaga2003@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:02 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CCbootcamp lab 1
1) Why configure OSPF in the following manner?
network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 10.10.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
and not
network 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 1
network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
2) They configure policy routing on all routers in the FR cloud. I did not
see the need for it.
Thanks,
BD
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:51 GMT-3