From: Jaroslaw Zak (jaroslawz@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 31 2002 - 08:21:04 GMT-3
Martin,
As for question 2 can you change under ospf at both R1 and R2 the network
statement (wild mask) into:
network 139.10.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
Just an idea.
HTH
Jarek
>From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>Reply-To: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>To: "Sara Li" <saralilin@hotmail.com>, <mm1343@sbc.com>,
><davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: 2 eigrp questions
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:40:53 -0800
>
>Hi
>
>That's not the case all the time
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note0
>9186a008009487e.shtml#1
>Look for connected routes example
>
>Infact martin is doing exactly the same, with one difference (not sure
>that's causing the problem)
>example has 10.x.x.x and 20.x.x.x, where as martin is using same class b
>address 139.10.x.x
>
>martin, can you make different classful address and try
>
>thanks
>Deepesh
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Sara Li
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:28 PM
> > To: mm1343@sbc.com; davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: 2 eigrp questions
> >
> >
> > for question 2, i think on r2's routing table that route shows connected
> > rather than 'O', so to redistribute it into eigrp, you got to
> > redistribute connected.
> >
> > >From: "MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI)" >Reply-To: "MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI)" >To:
> > "'csc david'" , ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE: 2 eigrp questions
> > >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:22:32 -0600 > >As you now know, the distance
> > 240 x.x.x.x only impacts internal "D" routes . >To influence "EX'
>routes,
> > type "distance eigrp 90 ? and you will find your >answer. Obviously the
> > 90 is for internal "D" routes and your answer will be >apparent when you
> > hit the question mark and then hit enter. > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: csc david [mailto:davidcsc2002@yahoo.com.cn] >Sent: Wednesday,
> > October 30, 2002 3:53 PM >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: 2 eigrp
> > questions > > >Hello, I have two eigrp questions: > >1 when I put
> > "distance 240 x.x.x.x" in "router eigrp", all the "D" routes >are
>changed
> > to 240, but the "D EX" routes are not(still 170), why? > >2
> > R1(s0)---------(s0)R2(s1)-----------------R3 (R1R2 run ospf, R2R3 >run
> > eigrp, redistribute them on R2) > > R2' s0 : 139.10.2.0 /24 > > R2' s1:
> > 139.10.3.0 /24 > > R1: router ospf 100 > > network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
> > area 1 > > network 139.10.2.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > > R2 router ospf 100 > >
> > redistribute eigrp 99 subnets > > network 139.10.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 > >
> > router eigrp 99 > > redistribute ospf 100 metric 64 10 255 1 1500 > >
> > network 139.10.3.0 0.0.0.255 > > no auto-summary > > R3: router eigrp 99
> > > > network 139.10.3.0 0.0.0.255 > > no auto-summary > >Then on R3 , I
> > can see the route "10.10.10.0", but cannot see "139.10.2.0", >Why? (They
> > are all from ospf): > >Thanks a lot ! > > > > >
> > >--------------------------------- >Do You Yahoo!?
> > >"JGIT>+S"Bp#?P!JTE#56;qJ1IP4s=1#!"
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! Click Here
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:36:00 GMT-3