From: Sara Li (saralilin@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 03:06:56 GMT-3
on Cisco CD, there is a configuration example for ethernet redundancy.
following is the code. the question is:mac address configured under e1
shouldn't it be the same as local-mac in the mapping statement?if it is
not what is the relationship between mac:4000.0000.0001 and
4000.0001.0000and mac 4000.0000.0011 and 4000.0201.0001? any help is
appreciated. Router A dlsw local peer peer-id 10.2.17.1 dlsw remote-peer
0 tcp 10.3.2.1 dlsw transparent switch-support interface loopback 0 ip
address 10.2.17.1 255.255.255.0 int e 0 mac-address 4000.0000.0001 ip
address 150.150.2.1 255.255.255.0 dlsw transparent redundancy-enable
9999.9999.9999 master-priority dlsw transparent map local-mac
4000.0001.0000 remote-mac 4000.0010.0001 neighbor4000.0000.0011 dlsw
transparent timers sna 1500 Router B dlsw local peer peer-id 10.2.17.2
promiscuous dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.3.2.1 dlsw transport switch-support
interface loopback 0 ip address 10.2.17.2 255.255.255.0 int e 1
mac-address 4000.0000.0011 ip address 150.150.3.1 255.255.255.0 dlsw
transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999 dlsw transparent local-mac
4000.0201.0001 remote-mac 4000.0010.0001 neighbor4000.0000.0001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. Click Here
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:58 GMT-3