Re: FRTS

From: frank.yu@japan.bnpparibas.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 19:48:04 GMT-3


And another trick for us to always remember is 1k=1024. ;-)

Frank

Internet
bf5tgh1@yahoo.com@groupstudy.com - 10/24/2002 09:37 PM

Please respond to bf5tgh1@yahoo.com

Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com

To: ghie_pogi, ccielab

cc:

Subject: Re: FRTS

Hi,

When you apply frame-relay traffic-shaping, every dlci
will be default to 56kbps. Solution 1 tells the router
you want dlci 403 has specified traffic shaping
parameters other than the default. Solution 2 is a
wrong answer for FRTS, if you compare soultion 1 and
solution 2 by 'show frame pvc <dlci>', you should be
able to see the difference clearly.

Chang
--- Angelo De Guzman <ghie_pogi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Hub and Four Spoke
>
> Objective: Configure such that the spokes
> does not over-subscribe the data carrying
> capacity of the Hub. No bursting over the CIR
>
> Solution 1:
> interface serial 0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 403
> class limit
>
> map-class frame-relay limit
> frame-relay cir 16000
> frame-relay bc 300
> frame-relay be 0
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
>
> Solution 2
> interface serial 0
> frame-relay class limit
>
> map-class frame-relay limit
> frame-relay cir 16000
> frame-relay bc 300
> frame-relay be 0
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
>
> What's the difference between solution 1
> and solution 2? I'm a little bit confused
> and doubts myself if they are the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Angelo
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:56 GMT-3