From: Horne, Bob (Robert.Horne@hp.com)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 14:08:53 GMT-3
Jim,
Either a) bug or b) route selection occurred before the MED was
evaluated.
Does the 151.51.111.111 next-hop route originate from an IBGP peer? Is
it sync'ed? Does the next hop route exist in the IP Routing table?
Regards,
Bob Horne
CCIE 2884
-----Original Message-----
From: jim.phillipo@guardent.com [mailto:jim.phillipo@guardent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:43 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP route selection question
Why is BGP choosing the route to 133.133.133.0 via 151.51.112.2 when it
has a higher metric ?
bb2#sho ip bgp
BGP table version is 30, local router ID is 202.202.5.111 Status codes:
s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin
codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i121.121.1.0/24 151.51.111.111 0 100 0 i
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
* i121.121.2.0/24 151.51.111.111 0 100 0 i
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
* i121.121.3.0/24 151.51.111.111 0 100 0 i
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 133.133.133.0/24 151.51.112.2 30 0 12 8723
4799 i
* i 151.51.111.1 10 100 0 12 8723
4799 i
*> 144.144.144.0/24 151.51.112.2 0 12 8723 i
* i 151.51.111.1 100 0 12 8723 i
*> 155.155.155.0/24 151.51.112.2 0 12 8723
4799 i
* i 151.51.111.1 100 0 12 8723
4799 i
*> 166.166.166.0/24 151.51.112.2 0 12 8723 i
* i 151.51.111.1 100 0 12 8723 i
*> 177.177.177.0/24 151.51.112.2 0 12 8723
4799 i
* i 151.51.111.1 100 0 12 8723
4799 i
*> 203.203.1.0 151.51.112.2 0 12 8723
4799
113 i
* i 151.51.111.1 100 0 12 8723
4799
113 i
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:56 GMT-3