FW: a nssa no-redis problem

From: Ebru Toker (EToker@tepum.com.tr)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 12:15:13 GMT-3


Chenyan,

On R3 you just have to write "area 1 nssa". R2 is both ABR and ASBR so what you write on R2 is true. Clear the no-redistribution no-summary statements from R3, you will see it works.

Ebru

-----Original Message-----
From: chenyan [mailto:chenyan@deeptht.com.cn]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:32 PM
To: ccielab
Subject: a nssa no-redis problem

hi,guys

R1---------------------R2--------------------------R3
       (area0) | (area1)
                       |
                       |
                       |
                      (RIP)
                       R4
 

R1:
interface Serial1
 ip address 172.28.2.8 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
router ospf 1
 network 172.26.4.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
 network 172.28.2.8 0.0.0.0 area 0

R2:
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 172.28.1.6 255.255.255.240
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 frame-relay interface-dlci 614
!
interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point
 ip address 62.5.1.6 255.255.255.128
 frame-relay interface-dlci 603
!
interface Serial0/0.3 point-to-point
 ip address 62.8.1.6 255.255.255.128
 frame-relay interface-dlci 605
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1
 ip address 172.28.2.6 255.255.255.0
 clockrate 72000
!
router ospf 1
 log-adjacency-changes
 area 1 nssa no-redistribution no-summary
 redistribute rip subnets
 network 172.28.1.6 0.0.0.0 area 1
 network 172.28.2.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
router rip
 timers basic 5 15 15 30
 network 62.0.0.0

R3:
interface Serial0
 ip address 172.28.1.14 255.255.255.240
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no ip route-cache
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 no ip mroute-cache
 frame-relay interface-dlci 416
!
!
router ospf 1
 network 172.28.1.14 0.0.0.0 area 1
 network 172.28.3.14 0.0.0.0 area 1
 area 1 nssa no-redistribution no-summary

But the routing table od R3:

     200.200.200.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 200.200.200.91/32 is directly connected, Async9
C 200.200.200.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
     100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 100.100.100.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     172.28.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.28.1.0/28 is directly connected, Serial0
C 172.28.3.0/27 is directly connected, Loopback1
     62.0.0.0/25 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O E2 62.8.1.0 [110/20] via 172.28.1.6, 00:31:03, Serial0
O E2 62.5.1.0 [110/20] via 172.28.1.6, 00:31:03, Serial0
O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/65] via 172.28.1.6, 00:31:03, Serial0

the E2 are suppoesd to be dispeard?
WHY?

Thanks



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:54 GMT-3