From: Mark (ms6275@yahoo.de)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 10:13:17 GMT-3
If I use backdoor then the EBGP route should never defeat the IGRP routing by
my understanding.
R3 has 8 meg flash hence
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-INS-L), Version 12.0(23), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Other peers
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.1(17), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
router bgp 65000
network 137.20.200.16 backdoor
network 137.20.200.18 backdoor
redistribute static
neighbor 137.20.200.18 remote-as 4
neighbor 137.20.200.18 ebgp-multihop 2
04:16:48: RT: recursion error routing 137.20.200.18 - probable routing loop
04:16:48: RT: recursion error routing 137.20.200.18 - probable routing loop
I would like to see this all the time
r3#i 137.20.200.16
Routing entry for 137.20.200.16/28
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 164, type extern 1
Redistributing via ospf 1
Last update from 137.20.100.34 on Serial0, 00:00:12 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 137.20.100.34, from 137.20.100.34, 00:00:12 ago, via Serial0
Route metric is 164, traffic share count is 1
But
r3#i 137.20.200.16
Routing entry for 137.20.200.16/28
Known via "bgp 65000", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 4, type external
Last update from 137.20.200.18 00:00:06 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 137.20.200.18, from 137.20.200.18, 00:00:06 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2
http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/bgp_r
/1rfbgp2.htm#xtocid15
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:54 GMT-3