From: Banlan Chen (banlan.chen@lycos.com)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 15:25:22 GMT-3
Hi Hunt,
I met same situation in my lab. The net type of your hub is point-to-multipoint and the spoke is non-broadcast (cause you didn't use network statement, point-to-multipoint subint's default ospf net type is non-broadcast). They can establish adj ("show ip ospf nei" is full), but actually no lsa exchange so there is no routes in routing table. I couldn't finf any explaination, so only thing I can do is set same network type between two ospf peers according Doyle I.
Banlan
--On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:43:36 Hunt Lee wrote: >Hello, > >Are Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint the only compatible pair of >Ospf Network Types (besides a type to itself)? > >I have tested this in a hub & spoke topology, the hub has 2 >point-to-point sub-interfaces (by "serial 0.1 point-to-point" & "serial >0.2 point-to-point", and when I creates the point-to-multipoint spoke >by "ip ospf network point-to-multipoint", everything is working as >expected. > >However, leaving the hub the same, if I create the point-to-multipoint >spoke by "interface serial 0.1 multipoint" command rather than using >"ip ospf network point-to-multipoint" command, the OSPF adjacency would >form, but never exchange tables. > >In both cases, I have set the Hello Interval at the hub's >point-to-point sub-interface to match the spokes by "ip ospf >hello-interval 30". > >Kind Regards, >Hunt Lee > >http://careers.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Careers >- 1,000's of jobs waiting online for you! >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:53 GMT-3