From: Nathan Chessin (nchessin@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 12:15:05 GMT-3
I found this to be true as well.
Nate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Prio Utomo
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:20 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP Sync Rule
>
>
> Dear Experts,
>
> I just want to confirm my understanding regarding the BGP
> Sync Rule, I read
> from Jeff Doyle that the rule said something like this
>
> "prefixes learned IBGP will be put in the IGP routing table
> or forwarded to
> EBGP if only those prefixes available in the IGP Routing
> table", right ?
>
> I tried to disable the syncronization on the border router
> but above rule is
> not applied... not until the next hope of those prefixes
> appear in the IGP
> routing table....
>
> So my concusion was when sync disabled in the border router
> the next hope of
> the prefixes must be appear in the IGP routing table as well,
> for those
> prefixes to be put in IGP routing table or forwarded to EBGP peer.
>
> Regards,
> PU
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:53 GMT-3