From: LoizosCisco (david_steven2001@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 22:20:23 GMT-3
You can use the area x range command to summarize to
the same bit as the IGRP. But still you bearking the
rule because you create null routes using a routing
protocol. To get around this you can use "no
discard-route internal" (for area x range) and "no
discard-route external" (for summary command). When
you use these commands (in router ospf mode)you will
see that instead routes to NULL they will point to an
interface in the routing table. This way you are not
breaking the rule.
I also saw some scenarios using secondary IPs and
policy-routing statements for IGRP to see the OSPF
routes.
Hope that helps
--- "Jung, Jin" <jin.jung@lmco.com> wrote:
> I guess this has been covered already, can some one
> refresh my memory.
>
> ri
> r2 r3
>
> I am running ospf and igrp on r1, r2 is running RIP
> r3 is running IGRP,,
>
> I have /22, /27/ /24/ /16 metwork that are
> redistrubuted from from ospf into
> RIP and IGRP,,
>
> I know that I coul use static route, but it's not
> allowed.
>
> I used "default-information origiante alway on OSPF
> process, Now RIP has
> default rotue to r1,
> But IGRP does not,, I could use "IP default-network"
> -- once again its not
> allowed,,
>
> What are some others ways to get the /22 /27 network
> into IGRP,,
>
> is only other way is to summery to /16 ???
>
> 172.16.32.0 /22
> 172.16.101.1 /24
> 172.16.55.0 /27
> ...
>
> Thanks in advance...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:51 GMT-3