From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 17 2002 - 15:03:45 GMT-3
Sorry Nathan, I don't follow you. Can you elaborate?
At 10:16 AM 10/17/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>you can on certain platforms, but not for the lab.
>
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120
>limit/120s/120s15/fiarospf.htm
>
>Nate
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Peter van Oene
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:17 AM
> > To: Senthil Kumar
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Filtering OSPF LSA type 3
> >
> >
> > You can filter the _generation_ of type 3 LSA's on the
> > originating ABR, but
> > you can't filter the reception of LSA's.
> >
> > At 02:12 PM 10/16/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> > >you can filter lsa's with ospf filter-list
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > >Sent: 16 October 2002 14:06
> > >To: Senthil Kumar; Dimitris Vassilopoulos; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: Filtering OSPF LSA type 3
> > >
> > >
> > >Keep in mind that you can't filter LSAs. You can filter routing
> > >information as it moves from the LSDB to the local routing
> > table, but not
> > >the reception and publication of the LSAs to the LSDB. Filtering LSA
> > >reception would directly violate the specifications and
> > likely lead to
> > >routing instability as SPF is only effective when everyone
> > looks at the
> > >same topology.
> > >
> > >At 01:58 PM 10/16/2002 +0100, Senthil Kumar wrote:
> > > >true, but what if you want to filter some lsa-3
> > only..distribute list might
> > > >help when introduced on inbound routes at all peers.wont it?
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > > >Sent: 16 October 2002 13:36
> > > >To: Dimitris Vassilopoulos; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: Re: Filtering OSPF LSA type 3
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >All you can do here is use the totally stubby knob on the
> > ABR(s). Once the
> > > >LSA is in the area, it is mandatory that all area resident
> > routers receive
> > > >the LSA and correctly process it. Distribute-list in
> > simply prevents any
> > > >relevant reachability information from making it to the
> > local routing
> > > >table, but has no effect on LSA's.
> > > >
> > > >At 01:35 PM 10/16/2002 +0300, Dimitris Vassilopoulos wrote:
> > > > >Team,
> > > > >
> > > > >Cisco says in
> > > >
> > >
> >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/12
> > >2t/122t4/ftabrt3f.htm
> > > >
> > > >that if you want to filter OSPF type 3 LSA you have to run 12.2(4)T.
> > > >I know that the image running in the lab is 12.1.x
> > > >
> > > >What if we're asked to filter inbound type 3 LSAs from a BB router?
> > > >We must use " distribute-list x in " in EVERY ospf router ?
> > > >
> > > >Any comment on that would be appreciated...
> > > >
> > > >Dimitris
> > >
> > >________________________________________________________________________
> > >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > >CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> > >visit
> > >http://www.citc.it
> > >
> > >___
> > >
> > >_____________________________________________________________________
> > >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > >CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> >visit
> > >http://www.citc.it
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________________________________________________
> >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> >CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> >visit
> >http://www.citc.it
> >
> >___
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> >CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
>visit
> >http://www.citc.it
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:49 GMT-3