Re: Help with Local Preference

From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Mon Oct 14 2002 - 18:33:40 GMT-3

Also it is propaged troughout an Confederation!

"Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)" wrote:
>
> Local pref propogates throughout an AS, so with all things equal it should
> go thru r2.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter van Oene [SMTP:pvo@usermail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:55 PM
> > To: Cristian Henry H
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Help with Local Preference
> >
> > Pref should override this.
> >
> > At 04:14 PM 10/14/2002 -0300, Cristian Henry H wrote:
> > >Externals first, then internals
> > >
> > >"D. Lee" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > R1 and R2 are IBGP peers within the same AS, and they are both EBGP
> > peering
> > > > with other AS.
> > > >
> > > > A route-map for local preference was created on R2 for a destination
> > X.
> > > >
> > > > R1 learned a route to X via his EBGP peer, and it was assigned a local
> > > > preference 100.
> > > > R2 also learned a route to X via his EBGP peer, and it was assigned a
> > > higher
> > > > local-pref 200
> > > > because of using the route-map. R2 passed the route with higher
> > > local-pref to
> > > > R1.
> > > >
> > > > >From the point of view of R1, the best path to X is through his EBGP
> > > peer or
> > > > R2??
> > > >
> > > > The router will prefer its external route or its internal route with
> > higher
> > > > local preference??
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all the feedback ...
> > >
> > >--
> > >Cristian E. Henry
> > >REUNA
> > >
> > >E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
> > >Fono: 56-2-3370336 

-- 
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA

E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:46 GMT-3