From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 14 2002 - 16:55:06 GMT-3
Pref should override this.
At 04:14 PM 10/14/2002 -0300, Cristian Henry H wrote:
>Externals first, then internals
>
>"D. Lee" wrote:
> >
> > R1 and R2 are IBGP peers within the same AS, and they are both EBGP peering
> > with other AS.
> >
> > A route-map for local preference was created on R2 for a destination X.
> >
> > R1 learned a route to X via his EBGP peer, and it was assigned a local
> > preference 100.
> > R2 also learned a route to X via his EBGP peer, and it was assigned a
> higher
> > local-pref 200
> > because of using the route-map. R2 passed the route with higher
> local-pref to
> > R1.
> >
> > >From the point of view of R1, the best path to X is through his EBGP
> peer or
> > R2??
> >
> > The router will prefer its external route or its internal route with higher
> > local preference??
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback ...
>
>--
>Cristian E. Henry
>REUNA
>
>E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
>Fono: 56-2-3370336
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:46 GMT-3