RE: rip

From: Adam Crisp (adam.crisp@totalise.co.uk)
Date: Mon Oct 14 2002 - 06:35:34 GMT-3

• Next message: Privat\: "Re: keyword "established" in access-list"
• Previous message: guljeet: "FW: LAB SWAP-S.O.S"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "rip"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Use a Prefix list to define the subnets you don't / do want to advertise,
use a distribute list under RIP

eg
ip prefix prevent_these_subnets seq 5 deny 140.4.4.0/24
ip prefix prevent_these_subnets seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge1 le 32

router rip
prevent_these_subnets
prevent_these_subnets
distribute-list prefix prevent_these_subnets out Ethernet X/X

!

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
chenyan
Sent: 14 October 2002 10:00
To: ccielab
Subject: rip

hi,all

(ospf)140.4.6.1/24---R1---140.4.68.1/24(rip)-----R2
                     |
                     |
              140.4.4.1/24(ospf)
I used the version 2 and no auto and mutual redistrute
I found the connected networks are sent to R2 as the rip routes,but I dont
want the R2 know the 140.4.4.0/24.
I used the route-map for ospf to prevent them, but it did not work.
I used the route-map for the redistr connected, but the same.
How can I do?

Thanks

• Next message: Privat\: "Re: keyword "established" in access-list"
• Previous message: guljeet: "FW: LAB SWAP-S.O.S"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "rip"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:46 GMT-3