From: Privat\ ("Erling)
Date: Sun Oct 13 2002 - 18:47:19 GMT-3
Nick,
how would you have done it, when having a hub&spoke FR cloud where R1 is the hub and R2/3 are the spoke? All are in the same subnet i.e. it is not possible to have sub interfaces at R1. The two PVC's at R1 are going to have different map class. Please correct me if I'm saying something wrong her.
Best Regards
Erling
> > Hi,
> > does this mean that Scenario 2 could be like this for a hub in a FR-cloud?
> >
> > interface s0/1
> > ip address 135.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > encap frame-relay
> > frame-relay traffic-shaping
> > frame-relay map ip 135.1.1.2 101 broadcast
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 101
> > class ccie1
> > frame-relay map ip 135.1.1.3 102 broadcast
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> > class ccie2
>
>
> Yes, even though its not the 'neatest' way to do it. It should work. Do a
> show frame PVC 101 & show frame pvc 102 and check to make sure they have
> inherited the properties of associated Traffic shaping parameters.
>
> rgds
> Nick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:46 GMT-3