From: Privat\ ("Erling)
Date: Sun Oct 13 2002 - 10:28:54 GMT-3
Hi,
does this mean that Scenario 2 could be like this for a hub in a FR-cloud?
interface s0/1
ip address 135.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encap frame-relay
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay map ip 135.1.1.2 101 broadcast
frame-relay interface-dlci 101
class ccie1
frame-relay map ip 135.1.1.3 102 broadcast
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
class ccie2
Regards
Erling Bjontegard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>
To: "SRINIVAS TENNETI" <st_552587@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: FRTS question
> Answers inline...
>
> > When applying the frame-relay map-class to a Main
> > interface. In a situation where there are no
> > sub-interfaces. Is it recommended to apply
> >
> > Scenario 1
> >
> > interface s0/1
> > encap frame-relay
> > frame-relay traffic-shaping
> > frame-relay class ccie
>
> All the subinterfaces underneath S0/1 and their respective PVC's (DLCI) will
> inherit the traffic shaping parameters specified in map class CCIE. However
> if you want to over ride this behaviour, just specify different map class on
> a PVC/subif where you want to use different parameters.
>
> > Scenario 2
> >
> > interface s0/1
> > encap frame-relay
> > frame-relay traffic-shaping
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 100
> > class ccie
>
> You seem to have forgotten the IP ADDRESS on s0/1.
> In this case only DLCI/PVC 100 will inherit traffic shaping parameters
> specified in class CCIE
> This is recommended.
>
> rgds
> Nick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3