From: MADMAN (dave@interprise.com)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 13:02:46 GMT-3
And unless it has recently changed, if you are using the overload
keyword I wouldn't waste addresses in a pool. IOS does not use NAT
until the last address in the pool and then switchover to PAT which the
PIX will do.
Dave
Peter wrote:
>
> Actually not really.
> The use of keyword "overload" in "ip nat inside source" statement depends on
> the number of ip addresses you have for translation. It has nothing to do
> with how many interfaces are "inside".
>
> __________________________
> Peter
> #7247 (R&S, Security)
> CyscoExpert Corp.
> 4433 W. Touhy Ave. Suite 410
> Lincolnwood, IL 60712
> Phone (847) 674-3392
> Fax (847) 674-2625
> www.cyscoexpert.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Stoddard" <dstoddard@thrupoint.net>
> To: "'chenyan'" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>; "'ccielab'"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:18 PM
> Subject: RE: nat problem
>
> > Absolutely!!! Usually requiring the key work "overload".
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > chenyan
> > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:01 PM
> > To: ccielab
> > Subject: nat problem
> >
> >
> > Hi,guys
> >
> > Is possible to have more than one "ip nat inside" and only one "ip nat
> > outside" on one router?
> >
> > Thanks
-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3