Re: Virtual-link authentication

From: Chris (clarson52@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 14:58:01 GMT-3

• Next message: Annu Roopa: "Ip address overlap"
• Previous message: Ccieyet2b@aol.com: "New BGP features"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris: "Virtual-link authentication"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ok, I need it on both. It does say area 0 is authenticated even if I do not
put a key on the virtual-link. Under sh ip ospf area 0 simple
authentication and all the routes are ggod

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Fletcher" <tim@fletchmail.net>
To: "Chris" <clarson52@comcast.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Virtual-link authentication

> Yes, and don't forget the "area 0 auth" on both ends of the virtual link.
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Chris wrote:
>
> > If a scenario calls for:
> > Enable area 0 for simple authentication. Authentication should be
enabled between all OSPF connected interfaces.
> >
> > I would be wanting to include the virtual link as well correct. With the
area 1 vert x.x.x.x authent-key blah

• Next message: Annu Roopa: "Ip address overlap"
• Previous message: Ccieyet2b@aol.com: "New BGP features"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris: "Virtual-link authentication"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3