From: esther (esther1616@hanmail.net)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 15:00:22 GMT-3
Yes you're right. I'm so confused ...
Just realized that the status of STP will not be appearing unless the
ports/vlans are actually connected and activated.
Thanks,
Ether.
---------[ 9^@: 8^@O 3;?k ]----------
> Title : Re: STP on 3550
> Date : Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:21:14 -0500
> From : Ray Masbad
> To : esther
> Cc : ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Esther,
>
> Is the Cat 3550 you are working with connected to another switch or
router?
>
> I ran into a similar situation and the only conclusion I arrived at
(and
> someone can correct me on this if I am wrong) was that the 3550 was not
> connected to anything while I was trying to configure it. I started
> seeing the STP instances as soon as I connected it to another switch.
>
> HTH
>
> esther wrote:
>
> >I've configuring the STP in the C3550.
> >The config guide mentioned the STP is enabled for vlan1 by default.
> >But I can't find any information using below command.
> >
> >Cat3550#sh spanning-tree (summary)
> >
> >No spanning tree instances exist.
> >
> >Cat3550#
> >Cat3550#
> >Cat3550#sh spanning-tree vlan 1
> >
> >Spanning tree instance for vlan 1 does not exist.
> >
> >Cat3550#
> >
> >So I made one more vlan 100 and enabled the STP on it.
> >But it brought the same result, nothing information.
> >
> >Cat3550#sh spanning-tree 100
> >
> >Spanning tree instance for bridge 100 does not exist.
> >
> >Cat3550#
> >
> >What's wrong here?
> >
> >Thanks again,
> >
> >Esther.
> >
> >[TABLE NOT SHOWN]
> >
> >[TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][IMAGE]
> >
>
>
>
[TABLE NOT SHOWN]
[TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][IMAGE]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3