From: Dotun Oni (dot_oni@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 15:14:46 GMT-3
Yes, but the dial-peer tags have to be different (10 and 20 in this case)
Try this on R1:
dial-peer voice 10 voip
destination-pattern 1111
preference 0
session target ipv4:10.10.10.10
dial-peer voice 20 voip
destination-pattern 1111
preference 1
session target ipv4:20.20.20.20
The above should put dial-peers 10 and 20 in a hunt group. R2 will be tried
first since it has lower preference number.
HTH
>From: Motohiro Yamanaka <yamanaka@fsas.fujitsu.com>
>Reply-To: Motohiro Yamanaka <yamanaka@fsas.fujitsu.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Doubt in VoIP
>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:08:51 +0900
>
>Hi,
>
>It is so.
>If Preference is applied respectively making two dial-peer, is it good?
>
>
>On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:46:59 +0200
>Enrique Hernandez <enrique.hernandez@telindus.es> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think you you could configure 2 dial-peers in R1 with the same
>telephone
> > number, different IP addressess and different precedence. If the
>dial-peer
> > with better precedence is unreacheable it should try to 'reach' the
> > telephone number using the other dial-peer.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Enrique Hernandez
> >
> > Network Consultant
> >
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > Telindus Spain
> > Plaza Ciudad de Viena, 6 2FPlanta
> > Torre Metropolitana
> > E-28040 Madrid
> >
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > <mailto: enhe@telindus.es>
> > tel: +34 91 456 00 08
> > fax: +34 91 536 10 74
> >
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > For more information about our products and services,
> > please visit our website: <http://www.telindus.es>
> >
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > Secure connectivity & mobility
> >
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: Motohiro Yamanaka [SMTP:yamanaka@fsas.fujitsu.com]
> > > Enviado el: viernes, 11 de octubre de 2002 8:50
> > > Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Asunto: Doubt in VoIP
> > >
> > > hi,all
> > >
> > > When 10.10.10.10 telephones are not connected by the undermentioned
> > > composition,
> > > I want to sound 20.20.20.20 telephones the replacement.
> > >
> > > Is the thing to do two addresses to such the same telephone number
> > > in mappings possible?
> > > Moreover, is the thing to apply priority possible?
> > >
> > >
> > > TEL(number=1111) TEL(number=1111)
> > > | |
> > > | 10.10.10.10 | 20.20.20.20
> > > R2 R3
> > > | |
> > > +----------+------------+
> > > |
> > > R1
> > > |
> > > TEL
> > >
> > >
> > > ------
> > > Motohiro
> > > yamanaka@fsas.fujitsu.com
> > >
> > >
> > >>>
> > 29th Telindus International Symposium
> > Thursday, October 24, 2002
> > Brussel Expo, Brussels, Belgium
> >
> > Meet over 2.000 business & ICT professionals for an in-depth networking
> > update at Telindus' 29th International Symposium.
> >
> > Check out the programme, partners, workshops and register now for free:
> > http://www.telindussymposium.com
> > <<<
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3