RE: Disappearing Routes

From: Carl Willias (mandingo2073@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 14:20:27 GMT-3


here are the revelant parts of the config. the IGRP
routes are sent over the serial interface and then
redistribute back into rip which is sent out thru int
vlan1

PS and yes the network that disappers is int
distribute-list 13...the thing is for a while it will
work then all of a sudden the subnet disappears for
the ip route table. and never comes back...

CW

_______________________________

interface Serial9/0/6
 ip address 128.160.18.1 255.255.255.0
 no fair-queue

interface Vlan1
 ip address 128.160.1.9 255.255.255.0
 ip rip send version 1 2
 ip rip receive version 1 2
 
router rip
 version 2
 redistribute static
 redistribute igrp 1205
 network 128.160.0.0
 network 192.12.90.0
 default-metric 1
 distribute-list 13 out Vlan1
 no auto-summary
!
router igrp 1205
 redistribute static
 redistribute rip
 passive-interface Vlan1
 network 128.160.0.0
 default-metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
 

--- steven.j.nelson@bt.com wrote:
> Carl
>
> Have you specified V2 only on your RIP facing
> interface.
>
> If you specify version 2 under the process, but
> leave the interface blank
> then it will send and receive V1 and 2 by default.
>
> The command you are looking for is
>
> interface ethernet 0
> ip rip send version 1
> ip rip receive version 1
>
> As for your dissapearing routes you will prbably
> have to post a config, and
> I would check the CCO BUG reference.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
> CCIE#10055
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Willias [mailto:mandingo2073@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 10 October 2002 14:48
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Disappearing Routes
>
>
> I am redistributing between RIP and IGRP. I have
> IGRP
> routes that are being sent to a 6513 with a MSFC
> card
> acting as a router. The router then redistributes
> the
> routes into RIPv2 but sends them out in both v2 and
> v1
> formats (we have Sun firewalls that do not
> understand
> v2). for some reason the routes will appear in the
> route table for a couple of weeks then disappear and
> the only way to get them back into the route table
> is
> to use static routes. I can see the routes coming
> in
> via IGRP but cannot see them in the RIP database on
> the 6513. The only thing that the routes have in
> common is that they are all in the 192.x.x.x network
> while my 6513 is in a different class B.
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> K
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com

--- Dave Stoddard <dave@stoddard.net> wrote:
> You control the version of RIP v1 & v2 that is being
> sent/received per
> interface by the following commands....
>
> interface ##
> ip rip send version #
> ip rip receive version #
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Carl Willias
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:48 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Disappearing Routes
>
>
> I am redistributing between RIP and IGRP. I have
> IGRP
> routes that are being sent to a 6513 with a MSFC
> card
> acting as a router. The router then redistributes
> the
> routes into RIPv2 but sends them out in both v2 and
> v1
> formats (we have Sun firewalls that do not
> understand
> v2). for some reason the routes will appear in the
> route table for a couple of weeks then disappear and
> the only way to get them back into the route table
> is
> to use static routes. I can see the routes coming
> in
> via IGRP but cannot see them in the RIP database on
> the 6513. The only thing that the routes have in
> common is that they are all in the 192.x.x.x network
> while my 6513 is in a different class B.
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> K
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:44 GMT-3