Redundacy needed?

From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos (Dimitris.Vassilopoulos@eurodyn.com)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 04:18:00 GMT-3

• Next message: Jayashanker Warrier: "Re: RSVP (CBWFQ / PQ-WFQ NOT RIGHT)"
• Previous message: Adam Crisp: "RE: bgp confederation med"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Team,

In case the lab scenario doesn't explicitly say to have multiple routes
towards some nets, or
multiple points of redistrubution for redundancy, we have to configure
just one "road"?
What if the topology helps on that?

Would it be wrong (or stupid) if we do, or it will count toward us?

Thanks

Dimitris

• Next message: Jayashanker Warrier: "Re: RSVP (CBWFQ / PQ-WFQ NOT RIGHT)"
• Previous message: Adam Crisp: "RE: bgp confederation med"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:43 GMT-3