From: Nathan Chessin (nchessin@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 02:05:59 GMT-3
I think I answered my own question.
I believe it's because RIPv1 tries to send the route at the classful
boundary, but can't because it is supernetted. 96.0.0.0/4 can't be
propagated by RIPv1 to X.0.0.0/8 Make sense? I think it does. Sorry for
the preemptive post.
Nate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Chessin [mailto:nchessin@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:57 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: BGP into RIPv1
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to redistribute an aggregate-address summary
> only from BGP into RIP.
>
> The aggregate-address is 96.0.0.0/4 and I can't summarize
> into rip, which is running on the 11.0.0.0 subnet. When I
> enabled RIPv2, the redistribution worked, but I am not
> understanding why.
>
> Any idears?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Nate
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:43 GMT-3