PIX vs Netscreen

From: Armand D (ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 14:01:23 GMT-3

• Next message: Khurram Hashmi (khashmi): "Cat 3550"
• Previous message: kpalmer: "re:re: 3rd time worst: THANK YOU ALL"
• Next in thread: James R. Scobey: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: James R. Scobey: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: P729: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Giana: "RE: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello all,

I'm wondering if anyone can give me their $0.02 on PIX
versus Netscreen. I work for a security services
company, and we sell a whole bunch of PIX but that's
changing. Lately, I'm touching a whole bunch of
Netscreen, Watchguard, etc.-- I keep hearing the
Netscreen product is vastly superior to PIX in terms
of price and performance. They also tout good central
management, site to site VPN tunnels.

Any feedback would be greatly appriciated.

Regards,

Armand

http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger for SMS
- Always be connected to your Messenger Friends

• Next message: Khurram Hashmi (khashmi): "Cat 3550"
• Previous message: kpalmer: "re:re: 3rd time worst: THANK YOU ALL"
• Next in thread: James R. Scobey: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: James R. Scobey: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: P729: "Re: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Giana: "RE: PIX vs Netscreen"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:42 GMT-3