ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?

From: Richard Davidson (rich@myhomemail.net)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 00:22:33 GMT-3

• Next message: Dave Stoddard: "RE: nat problem"
• Previous message: Baety Wayne SrA 18 CS/SCBX: "RE: FLSM and VLSM (I'm still having issues)"
• Next in thread: Privat\: "Re: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Maybe reply: Privat\: "Re: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

ebgp learned routes are sent to ibgp peer but ibgp learned routes are never sent to ibgp peers. That makes sense but what happens to locally generated routes via the network statement. They seem to be sent to all ibgp peers. If this is true, can some one point me to some documentation that explains what happens to the localy generated routes and how it is sent between ibgp peers?

Rich

• Next message: Dave Stoddard: "RE: nat problem"
• Previous message: Baety Wayne SrA 18 CS/SCBX: "RE: FLSM and VLSM (I'm still having issues)"
• Next in thread: Privat\: "Re: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Maybe reply: Privat\: "Re: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: ebgp->ebgp->ibgp but what about the locals?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:42 GMT-3