Passive interface for loopback interface

From: esther (esther1616@hanmail.net)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 02:36:30 GMT-3

• Next message: Tony Huang: "RE: Is there a way to simulate the PSTN network?"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: Is there a way to simulate the PSTN network?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

Wondering that is there any difference between loopback and general
interface (i.e. E0 or S0) when we define the passive-interface.
In other words, when we configure the loopback interface as the
passive-interface, is there any warning point compared with general
interfaces?

Where can I make overall good sense regarding the passive interface,
which case should I put and or not, please point me good document/URL to
make understanding entirely, specially for various remarkable points.

Thanks again,

Esther. [TABLE NOT SHOWN]

[TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][IMAGE]

• Next message: Tony Huang: "RE: Is there a way to simulate the PSTN network?"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: Is there a way to simulate the PSTN network?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:38 GMT-3