RE: thanks for your help and now Route reflector

From: Brian Dennis (brian@5g.net)
Date: Wed Oct 02 2002 - 16:57:01 GMT-3


RR's only "reflect" their best routes. They don't actually "reflect"
every route they learn to every RR client.

Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Svuillaume8@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:27 PM
To: brian@cyscoexpert.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: thanks for your help and now Route reflector

i've the same case with Route reflector but without
changing the local pref. I let the local 100 everywhere.
If i've one cluster with two RR and Two client, the client and left RR
learn two routes, and right RR and right client ONE route.

    R2 R3
    | |
    RR2___RR3
it's just a example??
In this example RR2 has two clients R2 and R3
                RR3 has two clients R2 and R3
and there is an normal Ibgp peer between RR2 and RR3.
There is no physical connexion between R2 and RR3, and
RR2 and R3, it is just to understant RR redundant.
The cluster id is 1000.
Problem: On RR2-R2 i ve many routes and RR3-R3 i've one route????

Most simply if i've the same example but
RR2 has two clients R2 and RR3
RR3 has two clients R3 and RR2
But there is no cluster id, i've the same problem
RR2 and R2 have two routes and RR3/R3 have one route!!!

Is it normal

Thanks for your help



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:38 GMT-3