RE: Loop Busters

From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com)
Date: Wed Oct 02 2002 - 19:31:26 GMT-3


Yeah, I like tags as well, although I do alter btwn that and redist routes
for no apparent reason.

How about costs, distances and the like? What's the best method to
configure? Any advice?

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Crisp [SMTP:adam.crisp@totalise.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Loop Busters
>
> I'm a great fan of route tagging
>
> You can tag routes when redistributing from say ospf to eigrp, and vica
> verca.
> you can say as part of your route map, not do redistrbute routes that are
> tagged with a certain number, and avoid loops.
> This is so easy and it is much cleaner than lengthy access-lists.
>
> Adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)
> Sent: 02 October 2002 21:14
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Loop Busters
>
>
> Group:
>
> Might I inquire what are everyone's preferred of breaking routing loops???
> I
> have been having alot of issues with routing loops lately and I have been
> considerably unsuccessful at breaking them on a consistent basis, even
> when
> employing route-maps.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> John



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:37 GMT-3